Ten days following the fragile ceasefire between India and Pakistan, both nations are tentatively exploring avenues to rekindle trade relations. While the cessation of hostilities offers a window for economic engagement, underlying political tensions and mutual distrust continue to cast a shadow over potential collaborations.
Background: The Ceasefire Agreement
On May 10, 2025, India and Pakistan agreed to a ceasefire after four days of intense cross-border skirmishes that resulted in significant casualties on both sides. The agreement, while welcomed globally, was marred by immediate violations, with explosions reported in border regions shortly after its announcement. Both nations accused each other of breaching the terms, highlighting the fragility of the truce.
Trade Talks: A Delicate Endeavor
In the aftermath of the ceasefire, attention has shifted towards economic diplomacy. India is keen on finalizing a trade agreement with the United States before a 90-day freeze on new tariffs expires on July 8. This urgency is driven by the desire to avert proposed “reciprocal” tariffs that could impact key sectors. Simultaneously, U.S. retailers like Walmart and Costco are exploring shifts in production to India to circumvent tariffs on Chinese goods. However, India’s textile industry faces challenges, including labor shortages, which may hinder its ability to capitalize on these opportunities.
Political Undercurrents and External Influences
The role of the United States in brokering the ceasefire has stirred discomfort in India. While U.S. President Donald Trump claimed credit for mediating the truce, India has officially refuted these assertions, emphasizing that the ceasefire was a bilateral decision. This divergence in narratives underscores the complexities of external influences on India-Pakistan relations.
Domestic Reactions and Criticisms
Within India, the government’s decision to agree to a ceasefire has faced scrutiny. AAP leader Manish Sisodia questioned the rationale behind the sudden halt in military operations, especially when India held a strategic advantage. He criticized Prime Minister Narendra Modi for not securing the extradition of those responsible for recent attacks and for not formalizing a peace pact akin to the 1972 Shimla Agreement.
Pakistan’s Stance and Commitments
Pakistan has reiterated its commitment to the ceasefire but has warned of decisive responses to any future aggression. The nation has also expressed readiness to engage in trade discussions, signaling a willingness to explore economic avenues amidst the prevailing tensions.
Challenges Ahead: Trust and Verification
Despite the potential for economic collaboration, significant hurdles remain. The suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty and visa services between the two nations continues, reflecting the deep-seated mistrust. Moreover, the immediate violations of the ceasefire agreement have further eroded confidence, making any substantial progress in trade relations contingent upon verifiable actions and sustained diplomatic engagements.
The post-ceasefire period between India and Pakistan presents a complex tapestry of cautious optimism and enduring skepticism. While economic imperatives drive both nations towards potential collaboration, the path is fraught with political landmines and historical baggage. For meaningful progress, both countries must prioritize transparent dialogue, build mutual trust, and engage in confidence-building measures that transcend mere economic interests.
Also read : PM Modi Declares New Normal In India’s Counter-Terrorism Strategy
